HB2 ConstructionThe first of July, 2008 the major material supply for making parts of HB2 (Home Brew 2) arrived in my shop. I’ll let you know right up front I have taken a short cut in acquiring some of the necessary materials for the HB2. After a lot of study and research I decided a working surface size about two feet by two feet was an area for which I had space and could afford to build. It also suits the majority of the products I want to create. I also wanted to keep tolerances tight enough to be able to do fine work in say a 3 or 4 inch square area. (9-16 sq. inches) Due to flex in longer span components such as unsupported linear bearing rods, it is impossible to produce really accurate detail on low cost larger machines. Those rods actually sag from their own weight! The solution is an extra heavy design and fully supported linear components, and that adds considerable cost. For me, HB2 seems to be in a sweet spot of accuracy, cost and size. I found this design produced by a company called PDJ, Inc. and named the Pilot Pro EX (PPEX). For me, it is a good design, reasonable cost (but not cheap) and has a great material source. Components can be purchased as a kit consisting of cut and surfaced material but otherwise unfinished. This is perfect for anyone with the tools and talent to assemble their own machine. PDJ doesn’t supply ALL the parts in this basic build-it-yourself kit, so I will still have to order the linear guides and bearings and a host of other details… So it is still pretty much home brew construction except for the proven design. The design is already close to where my idea sketches were going. I do have a few details to improve, nothing major. I want to finish some of the square parts to a more aesthetic (but no weaker) shape. Yes, PDJ can provide fully built single and dual machines too. I recommend you buy the offered CD to get a real good look if you don't want to wait on my build and photos. What sold me on the PPEX was when Phil D. Judd (the PDJ at PDJ) recently displayed on his web pages the Pilot Pro EX dual drive version of his single drive Pilot Pro design. The dual drive eliminates the heavy tie bar and eliminated the dedicated space that is required under the working surface required for a center drive screw. The linear components are fully supported. On a single center drive machine the heavy tie bar forms a strong box with the gantry above. However, it adds more weight and does get quite large as gantry span width increases. In my opinion, the center single drive reaches a practical limit as bed width increases. Wide linear bearing spacing at each gantry base is one way to help eliminate possible flex and binding problems (skew) of the single center screw design, but this can create some loss of usable work area because of the extra gantry base width. The round shaft version of the standard PDJ design looses a few inches of work area because of this wider bearing spacing. (Everything in engineering is a trade off!) In my design research I decided I wanted the drive force as close to the linear bearings as possible and close to the center of load. Driving both sides of the gantry permits a lighter and narrower gantry base providing maximum working area as well as no limit on base design depth. For example, with no cross bar it is possible to lower the working surface any distance desired under the side rails. The PPEX achieves this desire. There is little if any (skew) load on the dual screws. All large machines with a wide cross gantry use dual drive for this reason. I think of pushing a large empty box across a floor. If I push in the center of the front it goes OK until weight is added to one side. Then the box turns (or skews) because of the increased drag on the heavy side. Push on both corners at the same time and the box goes straight again. Yes, the work is harder at the heavy side but because the push steps are made equal length and are in sync, the box travels straight. The drive screws are Kerk brand. I was sold on Kerk screws before I discovered PDJ. I like the smooth performance these drive screws will provide. I have selected larger 5/8” screws with the Kerk coating material even though I think the standard ½” screws as recommended by Phil would be fine. I also opted for the 0.20” lead (5 TPI) rather than the standard 0.50” (2 TPI) screws. I want more torque rather than speed. Check out the Kerk web site for specs. I’ll show more on this detail later in the build. The unique design uses what is a rather small steel frame. The machine will rely on the base or bench on which it is mounted for much of the rigidity. That is acceptable to me as this is not intended to be a portable machine that can be moved from bench to bench. I like the idea that I can mount just about any kind of surface under the gantry and replace or re-design the surface whenever necessary. The linear rail system I am using is the most expensive part. There is over $1K in the rails and bearings alone. They are on order, but I have a lot to do before I need them. This will not be an overnight or over weekend build. Stay tuned. There will be much show and tell on the HB2. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Select "Next Section" below to continue with the HB2 construction story. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||